Not really, it only requires one irrefutable mark - what I call in the study 'dead body' evidence. And there are many. Examine the Arabian peninsula on Google Earth. Be observant, not hasty or cynical. I've been there physically and have seen the water marks first hand.
I do not buy your premise that there is no evidence. This is false.
An old book I read about earth mantil displacement used the fact that a lot of fossils are found all grouped together. Like they had been washed there and preserved in mud. And could also explain how we find foot prints in solid rock? Maybe the Pyramids were at the centre and the crust pivoted around the Pyramids to explain why the are still standing or they are the only structural thing that survives.
Appeal to Acceptance – asserting that, because a specific theory or conclusion is widely accepted, no evidence exists for any competing theories.
I don't buy this premise. Such evidence is very easy to locate if you make the slightest effort. The cocoon of a message board should not be used as a rhetorical appeal to ignorance.
This theory requires lots physical evidence.
An inundation of ocean water into Giza would drop all kinds of evidence.
Also, a shift of the crust of 104° would create all kinds of evidence from resulting earthquakes, all over the world.
Where is this evidence?
Not really, it only requires one irrefutable mark - what I call in the study 'dead body' evidence. And there are many. Examine the Arabian peninsula on Google Earth. Be observant, not hasty or cynical. I've been there physically and have seen the water marks first hand.
I do not buy your premise that there is no evidence. This is false.
In the second article hes saying the erosion on the pyramids shows they were under water for over 50 years. That is the evidence hes pointing to.
That's not enough evidence. An inundation at that scale should produce evidence at dozens of different sites.
An old book I read about earth mantil displacement used the fact that a lot of fossils are found all grouped together. Like they had been washed there and preserved in mud. And could also explain how we find foot prints in solid rock? Maybe the Pyramids were at the centre and the crust pivoted around the Pyramids to explain why the are still standing or they are the only structural thing that survives.
I agree
Appeal to Acceptance – asserting that, because a specific theory or conclusion is widely accepted, no evidence exists for any competing theories.
I don't buy this premise. Such evidence is very easy to locate if you make the slightest effort. The cocoon of a message board should not be used as a rhetorical appeal to ignorance.