The individual or team who can craft a keen vision of the core ACAN problem is the only entity which stands even a remote chance of actually solving it
I read this this a.m., and am listening to a new school superintendent at a major urban district give her speech to all school district employees. She just said "equity is a verb."
If you meant "coarse" language (and it's in response to "WTSHTF") then I would respectfully note that your statement is incorrect. Some writing with coarse language is demonstrably better than that without - if you're writing a story about soldiers in war, or dockworkers, or mobsters, a story w/o vulgarity will ring so untrue as to be unreadable.
I'll concede that is generally the case for fiction narrative more often than it's non-fiction, but sometimes calling bullshit is the most effective way of communicating what's going on. Victorian sensibilities don't change that. Even the Supreme Court conceded that "Fuck the Draft" on a jacket was a viable form of protected 1A speech, as is burning a flag (though I believe the dissent's characterization of that as the "inarticulate grunt" of political speech is more true than not).
The ACAN Problem - When the Shit Hits the Fan
I read this this a.m., and am listening to a new school superintendent at a major urban district give her speech to all school district employees. She just said "equity is a verb."
ACAN problem.
@Barry -
If you meant "coarse" language (and it's in response to "WTSHTF") then I would respectfully note that your statement is incorrect. Some writing with coarse language is demonstrably better than that without - if you're writing a story about soldiers in war, or dockworkers, or mobsters, a story w/o vulgarity will ring so untrue as to be unreadable.
I'll concede that is generally the case for fiction narrative more often than it's non-fiction, but sometimes calling bullshit is the most effective way of communicating what's going on. Victorian sensibilities don't change that. Even the Supreme Court conceded that "Fuck the Draft" on a jacket was a viable form of protected 1A speech, as is burning a flag (though I believe the dissent's characterization of that as the "inarticulate grunt" of political speech is more true than not).
I am so asleep this morning...Barry Okenyan are you being tongue in cheek to TES?
Course language (ha ha) reads as coarse language....
I can't understand the terminology either, would take a week of study to figure
out....
This is kinda like the BCG four squares thing with stars, cash cows, etc.
IN 3D...
TES,
Please don't use coarse language. It adds to nothing in a written form of communication.