Trend and 'linear fit' are not congruent, despite your insistence that they are. There exists such a thing called Non-Linear optimization (my Major is in this). It uses the Golden Section method to conduct regression/trend analysis.
As you can see below, gravity (no inflection, single function, and indeed a TREND) produces a trend in the…
Trend and 'linear fit' are not congruent, despite your insistence that they are. There exists such a thing called Non-Linear optimization (my Major is in this). It uses the Golden Section method to conduct regression/trend analysis.
As you can see below, gravity (no inflection, single function, and indeed a TREND) produces a trend in the motion of a planet, but if you place an R^2 on it the fit is going to be horrible. Does that mean that gravity does not exist!!!!!!!!!!?????
This is what you are saying - that gravity does not exist, because it doesn't fit an R^2 well.
Trend and 'linear fit' are not congruent, despite your insistence that they are. There exists such a thing called Non-Linear optimization (my Major is in this). It uses the Golden Section method to conduct regression/trend analysis.
As you can see below, gravity (no inflection, single function, and indeed a TREND) produces a trend in the motion of a planet, but if you place an R^2 on it the fit is going to be horrible. Does that mean that gravity does not exist!!!!!!!!!!?????
This is what you are saying - that gravity does not exist, because it doesn't fit an R^2 well.
https://theethicalskeptic.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Gravity-does-not-exist.png